[linux] BugTracker + prepojenie na nejaky doc. managment softver

[Matus Horvath]

Martin Hudec wrote:

> Ahoj,
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:39:10AM +0100 or thereabouts, Matus Horvath 
> wrote:
>
>> BTW, aj vyvoj FreeBSD postupne prechadza z CVS na Perforce...
>>
>
> S tym prestupom na Perforce u FreeBSD by som to nevidel az
> tak nadsene :). Perforce zacli pouzivat mnohi mainstream vyvojari
> ako svoj nastroj, ale tiez to trvalo neaky dlhsi cas :) a navyse
> Perforce ma podla nich niektore muchy ako nemoznost offline operacie,
> resp. nestandardny format patchov. Mozno aj preto zatial nie je
> dostatok argumentov a motivacie, aby sa Perforce prehlasil za hlavny
> mechanizmus :). Zatial sme stale na CVS, aj ked uz boli ostre debatky
> ohladne tychto systemov :).

Ok, asi vies co hovoris, ja som cerpal informacie len z tohoto mejlu:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-November/042462.html

konkretne z tejto jeho casti:
"Second, it means that development efforts for major features will
continue to shift out of CVS and into Perforce. This already happens
quite a bit, so it's not as radical of a change as it seems. CVS HEAD
will remain the 'experimental' development branch, but large items will
not be brought into it until they are functionally complete and
integrated. HEAD may still get unstable from time to time, but it
hopefully won't turn into the collision of lots of half-done
experimental things like it has in the recent past. It also means that
if a major feature isn't done in time for a -STABLE branch-point that it
can continue to be developed outside of the CVS tree and be made ready
for the next scheduled branch point."

Matus